Oh my - over at Poets United, they've challenged all comers to write a Fibonacci poem...
Welcome to Verse First, where simple notions prompt amazing poems.
Today's notion?
THE FIBONACCI NUMBER SEQUENCE
Fibonacci
poetry is a literary form based on the Fibonacci number sequence. The
sequence begins like this: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21. In order to find
the next number in the sequence, you add the two preceding numbers. The
sum of these two is the next number, which then is added to the one
before it to get to the next number, and so on.
This is how it works:
1 + 0 = 1
1 + 1 = 2
2 + 1 = 3
3 + 2 = 5
5 + 3 = 8
8 + 5 = 13
13 + 8 = 21
Fibonacci
poems can embody the sequence in syllables or in words; and the poem can
be any length, so long as each line's count equals the sum of the two
preceding lines. Obviously, this gets a little cumbersome past 13 or 21,
but hey... do what ya gotta do!
Okay, I can do this. I'll base it on a mantra I used (well, still use) to get my head straight when feeling fragmented and to center me in the present moment. I'll do words instead of syllables. Here goes:
One.
One being.
One being becoming.
One being becoming more fully.
One being becoming more fully aware of being.
Well, that's about all there is to the mantra. But that was too easy. I'll try another:
Tao
The Way
Seeking the Source
Practicing Simplicity, Patience, and Compassion
Learning Wu Wei - (translation: Doing by Not Doing)
Can I be still like a puddle and let my silt settle out?
Act without seeking reward or appreciation? Lead by following? Take to heart this ancient wisdom: that acquisitiveness and possessiveness are folly?
I will allow this knowing to enfold me like a mother, contain me like a womb, warm and nurture and incubate me as I evolve these skills I need to survive and be whole.
In a world all-too-fraught with frantic selfishness and greed, we all could use a little Tao. I don't identify as a Toaist, though. The religion, as I understand it (mainly through looking at some old texts), it involves some kooky alchemy and meditation techniques which I find, frankly, dangerous. No out-of-body experiences for me, thanks.
Wow – as one
spirals outward from the pithy, poignant center of the Fibonacci sequence in
words, poetry degenerates into prose. Maybe I should’ve quit while I was ahead.
Oh well. While the tape still rolls… I’m put in mind of something I read by the
Dalai Lama, His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso. He said that in his daily meditations,
he sends his essence out to his opposers (those Chinese officials whose
policies keep him in exile and act to undermine the sovereignty of Tibet). He
imagines filling them with love.
I used to
practice a similar meditation. This was back before the onset of my disorder,
when I lived and taught in South Korea for five years. I would still my mind,
then envision love emanating from my body in all directions like rays of light.
The light would become flame, and it would spread from me like wildfire, igniting
my surroundings and eventually engulfing the whole world. It was a
well-intentioned meditation, obviously, but in the end I have to conclude that
it wasn’t healthy for me. Or at least that it certainly wouldn’t be healthy for
me now. Having been through the experience of losing my mental footing, of
misplacing my center and reeling in psychosis, my sense of self fragmented and
conflicted, deluded and hallucinatory, I no longer feel that it’s in my own best
interest to be a metaphysical superhero.
One more step
in the Fibonacci… Before I divorce this kissing cousin of the golden mean, echo
out of the snail’s tornado shell into the calm beyond the storm, one more
thought about the Tao: it’s always ironic to try and put the Tao into words.
The first precept discussed in the Tao te Ching is that the Tao which can be
expressed is not the true Tao. It’s like Fight Club in that way: the first rule
is that it is not to be talked about. I think of that old saying – those who
know don’t say, and those who say don’t know. Or this one: better to remain
silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove yourself one. So
yeah, it’s ironic. I studied irony when I was a grad student of literature (a
degree which I haven’t finished) and learned there are many types. My specific
field of study was postmodern humor, and the type I was most concerned with was
what is termed ‘unstable irony’. It’s when the ironic statement or situation
refuses to resolve itself one way or another, true or false, for or against,
forcing the reader to make the judgment call. So you decide: Taoism – healthy or
unhealthy? Helps you survive or drives you crazy? Or both? I’ve heard that going
mad is the only rational response to an insane world…
No comments:
Post a Comment